Konfidi Compared: Difference between revisions
From Konfidi
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by Chewbacca (Chewbacca); changed back to last version by 71.205.192.51) |
(removed some authentication systems, leaving mostly trust systems) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* tags (folksonomy-style) for topicality, used only as a tie-breaker | * tags (folksonomy-style) for topicality, used only as a tie-breaker | ||
* cryptographic security? | * cryptographic security? | ||
== [http://www.ciphire.com/ Ciphire] == | == [http://www.ciphire.com/ Ciphire] == | ||
| Line 39: | Line 32: | ||
== [http://www.sixapart.com/typekey/ TypeKey] == | == [http://www.sixapart.com/typekey/ TypeKey] == | ||
Latest revision as of 09:24, 26 January 2008
These are some key differences I have noticed; far from complete.
NetMesh: LID
- authentication + profile exchange + authenticated messaging + other features
- Your URL as identifier (you must set up CGI scripts there)
- public LID service in beta at http://mylid.net/
- No central registry of URLs
- Uses an open-ended list of vocabularies, e.g. VCARDS, FOAF
- Manages identity (who can know what about you...)
- Explicitly list which individuals and/or groups can see what
- does use pgp
- See also LID compared to other systems
Outfoxed
- primary use is to rank/rate webpages
- centralized server (?)
- does have trust rankings
- tags (folksonomy-style) for topicality, used only as a tie-breaker
- cryptographic security?
Ciphire
- "trust" denoted by limited public key sharing (they use a proprietary format of keypairs)
- applied to email only
- email marked with an inline footer
- seems that it runs locally and intercepts SMTP, IMAP, and POP connections
- free only for non-commercial use